Is this site useful to you? If you would like to
make a donation to help maintain this site, please click on the button below.
It's easy and secure using PayPal. By making a donation you help improve content
and limit ads.
CouesWhitetail.com is a proud winner of:
In recognition of creativity, integrity and
excellence on the Web.
For more information about Arizona's Operation
Game Thief Program, click on the logo above
TAILS
WITH A DARK SIDE: The truth about whitetail - mule deer hybrids
By Jim
Heffelfinger
Author of the book “Deer of the Southwest” visit his website
www.deernut.com to get a copy.
The
“Minotaur” of Greek mythology was a creature that was half man and half bull.
Hybrids have always fascinated us throughout the history of mankind. Many of
our monsters are a mixture of man and beast (Wolfman, Dracula, the Fly).
Likewise, consider our heros: Spiderman, Batman, and Cat Woman. Our obsession
with creatures that are half one thing and half another extends to our
enjoyment of wildlife. Early naturalists often described new animals as a
combination of parts from animals already known to man. The mule deer was
described by John J. Audubon in 1846 as having fur like an elk but hooves
like a whitetail.
Whenever hunters gather, there is always abundant talk about the types of deer
from different areas: Kansas whitetails, Montana mule deer, Sitka blacktails,
Key deer, Coues deer, Carmen
Mountain whitetails, fat Wisconsin does, and wide South Texas giants. Despite
all the differences across the country, there are actually only 2 species of
deer in the U.S.: white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and mule
deer (Odocoileus hemionus). The different-looking black-tailed deer of
the pacific northwest is actually a type (subspecies) of mule deer.
All
native deer in North America are either mule deer or
whitetails. On rare occasions, however, we hear of a deer which can not
neatly be labeled as one or the other. This mysterious deer looks mostly like
a mule deer but has a tail with a dark back-side like a whitetail.
Different species of animals, even closely related ones, are normally kept
from breeding by being geographically isolated from one another, or by
separating themselves into different types of habitat. If the animals coexist
in the same habitat then they generally have different courtship and breeding
behavior to prevent interbreeding.
In most
areas of the West where both deer species are found, mule deer inhabit the
higher mountain areas and whitetails occupy the lower valleys and river
systems. This habitat preference is reversed in the southwest where Coues
whitetails are found in the mountains above 4,000 feet and the desert mule
deer occupy the lower-elevation valleys and foothills. Because of the
interspersion of whitetail habitat (mountains) throughout mule deer habitat,
the southwest has an extensive zone where the two species coexist. This
results in the animals being in close proximity to one another during the
breeding season. It is not uncommon to see a group containing both whitetails
and mule deer in these areas of overlap.
In the
case of whitetails and mule deer, courtship and breeding behavior is different
enough that body language and scent cues given off by a female mule deer
during rut are not "understood" by a male whitetail and vice versa. Also, in
many areas where their range overlaps, the rut peaks at slightly different
times for the 2 species. This system of species segregation has worked
remarkably well throughout their evolutionary coexistence. However, in rare
cases this system breaks down and genetic material slips across the behavioral
barrier, resulting in a deer that is half whitetail and half mule deer. This
hybridization between the two different deer species is extremely rare but
does occur throughout the West where their ranges overlap.
These
bucks show characteristics which are intermediate between mule deer and
whitetails. Body size and facial features indicate a mule deer but the tail
is usually dark chocolate brown or black on top and white underneath. The
tail of a hybrid looks very much like a typical whitetail, but is frequently
much darker. Ears are normally larger than a whitetail but smaller than a
mule deer. The preorbital gland in front of the eye is also intermediate
between the deep pits found in mule deer and the shallow depression of
whitetails.
What
about the antlers? Forget about the antlers; this is a worthless
characteristic to judge whether an animal is a hybrid or not. Most documented
hybrids have whitetail-like antlers but you can’t count on antlers alone. I
have 3 sets of antlers in my livingroom: 2 are whitetails with forked primary
tines (G2) and the third is a desert mule deer with 8 long points, all arising
from the mainbeam. There is simply too much variation in antlers to serve as
a reliable indicator of hybridization. The whitetails in the Carmen Mountains
of northern Mexico have been shown to exhibit a high degree of forked antlers
like mule deer.
The
best feature to determine if a deer is a hybrid is the size of the metatarsal
gland, which is located on the outside of the lower portion of the rear
legs. This should not be confused with the tarsal glands on the inside of the
legs. The metatarsals on mule deer sit high on the lower leg and are 3 to 6
inches long and surrounded by light brown fur. The whitetail's metatarsals
are at or below the mid-point of the lower leg, usually less than 1 inch, and
surrounded by white hairs. A whitetail-mule deer hybrid has metatarsal glands
that split the difference, usually measuring between 2-4 inches and encircled
with white hair.
Two
year-old mule deer are most frequently mistaken for hybrids. This is because
of their smaller antler development and the fact that the dichotomous
branching, producing the big "forks", usually does not occur until the buck is
3 years old. Young mule deer sometimes give the appearance of a very large
white-tailed deer, especially if it’s tail has a dark stripe down the back, as
sometimes occurs. Mule deer in some areas, like southern California, have a
dark band running down the back of their tails.
Hybrids
have been reported from captive facilities as early as 1898 when a
whitetail-mule deer cross was produced at the Cincinnati Zoo. Occurrences
were later reported from the Zoo in Minot, ND, deer pens in Alberta, and
others. Researchers in Tennessee also successfully produced whitetail-blacktail
hybrids in a captive situation.
In the
1930s, biologists in Arizona
produced hybrids by mating mule deer males to whitetail females and also
whitetail males to mule deer females. These matings resulted in 9 hybrid
fawns, of which only 4 survived the first few months. The research ended
abruptly and the deer had to be released before any meaningful data could be
collected. In the 1970s, Gerald Day also produced hybrids in captivity in
Arizona.
Ten hybrids were born but only 4 lived past 6 months of age. Survival appears
to be very low in hybrids even when pampered in a captive facility.
Coues whitetail x desert mule deer hybrid (F1)
produced in captivity by
Gerald Day in the early 1970s. Note the whitetail-like antlers and tail, but
intermediate metatarsal gland on the outside of the lower rear legs. Photo
by Gerald Day.
Survival in the wild is even more difficult when food doesn't come from a feed
trough and there's no fence between them and animals with sharp teeth. To
complicate matters, hybrids inherit predator avoidance strategies from both
types of parents; the problem is, whitetail and mule deer have drastically
different techniques for escaping predators.
The
whitetail’s key to escaping is speed. They put their head down, follow
established trails, and try to put as much distance between themselves and the
predator as possible, as fast as possible. Mule deer, on the other hand, have
developed a pogostick-like bounding called "stotting", where all four hooves
hit the ground at the same time. This strategy developed in mule deer because
they evolved in wide open and rugged country throughout the West. Their
escape by stotting is not as fast as the whitetail's, but in rugged terrain it
is effective for putting obstacles between the predator and the deer. Mule
deer can bound over boulders and stumps that the predator must run
around.
Research by Susan Lingle using captive animals in Alberta, has shown that
stotting is so specialized that only deer that are 100% mule deer can do it.
Even a 1/8 whitetail X 7/8 mule deer fails miserably. The hybrid's escape
behavior is chaotic; the deer will typically approach the threat and jump
around in confusion. Such behavior is not conducive to passing their genes on
to another generation.
Whitetail-mule deer hybrids have also been reported in the wild from Alberta,
British Columbia, Nebraska, Kansas, Colorado, Washington, Texas, and Arizona.
Biologists have documented the presence of hybrids in the wild on only a few
occasions. The relative scarcity of confirmed hybrids among the hundreds of
thousands of deer that have been seen throughout the area of range overlap
illustrates how rare they are. Every year numerous reports are received of
"hybrid" deer from hunters. Arizona researcher, Gerald Day (who produced
captive hybrids) investigated over 200 reports of "hybrids" and did not find a
single legitimate whitetail-mule deer hybrid. Most of these hybrid reports come
from hunters who have a whitetail tag on the leg of a mule deer and are trying
to convince the Game Warden that they are at least half right.
Recent
advances in DNA analysis technology has allowed us to look at more definitive
things than ears and antlers. The production of proteins in the body is
regulated by genes so by analyzing differences between some proteins,
researchers can identify what species a sample of tissue came from. Serum
albumin is a protein that has proven particularly useful. Analyzing this
protein with a process called electrophoresis produces a series of horizontal
bands on a gel surface. This protein produces a band in a different location
for whitetails and mule deer. When a hybrid is tested, both the whitetail
and the mule deer bands are present. The same result can be had by mixing
whitetail burger with mule deer burger and running the test on the mixture.
There seems to be some exceptions to the unique banding patterns but this test
is at least 95% accurate.
In west
Texas,
managers have reported an increasing trend in the number of hybrids they see on
their ranches. In the early 1980s, whitetails and mule deer in a 5-county area
were tested using serum albumin and researchers found that on the average 5.6%
of the deer they tested were hybrids. Individual ranches ranged from 0% to
24%!
At the
same time, other researchers were busy analyzing the genetics of whitetails and
mule deer on a ranch in west Texas with a different method. This method looks
at mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), which is a type of DNA that every animal inherits
from only its mother. This is useful because a hybrid that has a whitetail
mother and mule deer father, will have only whitetail mtDNA (the rest of the DNA
will be from both mother and father). If the hybrid was a female, it would
continue to pass whitetail mtDNA through it’s daughters and their daughters even
if bred by mule deer bucks. After a few generations, the results of these
matings would look like mule deer but would have pure whitetail mtDNA from their
mother and grandmother.
And
that’s apparently what happened; these researchers found that the mule deer on
the ranch had mtDNA that was indistinguishable from the whitetails on the
ranch. They concluded hybridization was common on this ranch. Even more
surprising, a different type of analysis showed that the mtDNA of mule deer on
this ranch was more closely related to whitetails from South Carolina
than to blacktails (a type of mule deer) from northern California! This
relationship indicated, that hybridization must have occurred between mule deer
bucks and whitetail does because the whitetail mtDNA they carried was inherited
from their mothers.
These
findings run contrary to the conventional theory that most hybridization occurs
between a whitetail buck and mule deer doe. This theory is based on the
different breeding strategies of the two species. The whitetail buck is
accustomed to chasing a whitetail doe relentlessly until she allows him to
breed. The mule deer breeding behavior is much more relaxed with the doe only
moving a few steps if she is not ready. A whitetail doe would run far away from
a pursuing mule deer buck, confusing him; but a mule deer doe would not run far
from a whitetail buck in pursuit. It seems more likely then, that a persistent
whitetail buck would be more likely to breed with a mule deer doe.
Another
researcher in Montana
used both of these methods (Albumin and mtDNA) to determine the extent of
hybridization and found very little, if any, had occurred in that state.
Interestingly, like the west Texas study, whitetails and mule deer were found to
be more closely related to each other than blacktails and mule deer which are
the same species (different subspecies).
This
relatively close relationship between whitetail and mule deer and their genetic
differences from blacktails has spawned a new theory that the mule deer itself
is actually a hybrid form; the result of a mixing of genes from coastal
blacktail bucks mating with whitetails does when the glaciers of the last Ice
Age receded, bringing the two species together. The resulting offspring then
changed drastically over the last 10,000 years in response to environmental
conditions. This would explain the similarities between whitetail and mule deer
mtDNA. Analysis of the rest of the DNA (nuclear DNA) with Polymerase Chain
Reaction-based microsatellites or any of the other rapidly developing techniques
will add much to our knowledge of the origin of deer.
This
theory is interesting since black-tailed deer actually look like a cross between
a whitetail and a mule deer. This observation is not solely mine, nor is it
new. Early explorers, Lewis and Clark noted in their journal “the black-tailed
fallow deer are peculiar to this coast and are a distinct species, partaking
equally of the qualities of the mule deer and the common deer [whitetail]”. In
1939, famous outdoor writer, Jack O’Conner also remarked that a whitetail-mule
deer hybrid “more nearly resembles the Columbian blacktail than it does either
of its parents.”
Regardless of the origin and evolution of our deer species, whitetail and mule
deer hybrids do occur. However, they are extremely rare in the wild and almost
impossible to accurately identify on the hoof because of the large variation in
characteristics in each species. Some whitetails have characteristics (tails,
forehead) which look like mulies and some mule deer may have whitetail-like
features (no antler forks, black line on the back of the tail). Hybrids can not
be identified with certainty at a distance, and it is highly unlikely that a
hunter will see a hybrid while afield. The low number of interspecies matings
and the low survival of hybrid offspring reduce the chance of encountering one
in the wild to near zero.
To learn more about Coues whitetails
and southwestern mule deer watch for Jim’s upcoming book “Deer of the
Southwest.”