GameHauler

You guys need to stay out of the Mescal

Chef, It is RP Brass and what I would call a semi jacketed, semi wadcutter bullet. Thanks

I hit an Estate sale this week and broke my bank. Rather than try to sort through all the loading supplies with the other wolves over my shoulder and miss something I bought everything they had. (OUCH) So I have a bunch of stuff I do not need and I will give you guys first shot at it. Most of the inventory is done but I do have more stuff if you do not see what you are looking for send me a PM. All prices are local pick up but will ship at cost. Will try to arrange delivery to the valley and can deliver to some other central AZ locations. I know I could get them to Cottonwood and Show Low. BRASS 220 swift- Norma Brass- 112 ct. $75.00 220 swift- WW Brass- 60 ct. $20.00 270 Win.- FC Brass- 54 ct. $15.00 270 Win.- RP Brass- 62 ct. $20.00 30-06 FC Brass- 45 ct. $15.00 30-06 RP Brass- 26 ct. $10.00 30-06 Win Brass- 22ct. $10.00 300 WinMag WW Brass- primed- 18ct. $18.00 300 HH- RP Brass- 15+4 extra. 10.00 257 Roberts RP 64 ct. + 18 UMC $20.00 264 Win. Mag. mixed 16ct. $5.00 444 Marlin 15 ct. $5.00 38-40 45 ct. $5.00 7MM Mauser 10 ct. $2.00 25-06 WW Brass- 71 ct 2 bxs, 51 loose $30.00 25-06 RP Brass- 71 ct. $25.00 25-06 FC Brass- 72 ct. $25.00 7.62 Russ. Norma Brass- 57 ct. $50.00 40 S.W. 56ct. $5.00 357 Sig. 65 ct. $10.00 45 Long Colt 400+ $80.00 44 Rem Mag 350ct. $60.00 AMMO 32 H&R 62ct. $25.00 32 S&W Long 23ct. $10.00 32 Colt S.P. 16ct. $10.00 444 Marlin 24ct. $35.00 257 Roberts 19ct $25.00 303 British 29ct. $30.00 284 Win. 47ct. $75.00 38 ACP 100ct. $30.00 38 ACP 75ct. $22.50 38 ACP jacketed and hollow pt. 55ct. $22.00 45 L.C. 50ct. $35.00 32-40 8 rounds + 4 brass $15.00 I also have bullets, Sabots and taper paper patch, just have not gone threw them yet. Thanks

I hope not Stay Paper Please Money on the barrel head That is hunter opportunity for AZ hunters N.M. NV. CAL. Not meant towards you. Well maybe Callies

Coues-n-Sheeps house Not sure but I sure would like to have the lumber.

Please pay attention to this note! Hi All, I checked with NortonAnti-Virus, and they are gearing up for this virus. I checked Snopes and it is for real!! Get this E-mail message sent around to your contacts ASAP. PLEASE FORWARD THIS WARNING AMONG FRIENDS, FAMILY AND CONTACTS! You should be alert during the next few d ays. Do not open any message with an attachment entitled 'POSTCARD,' regardless of who sent it to you. It is a virus which opens A POSTCARD IMAGE, which 'burns' the whole hard disc C of your computer. This virus will be received from someone who has your e-mail address in his/her contact list. This is the reason why you need to send this e-mail to all your contacts It is better to receive this message 25 times than to receive the virus and open it. If you receive a mail called' POSTCARD,' even though sent to you by a friend, do not open it! Shut down your computer immediately. This is the worst virus announced by CNN. It has been classified by Microsoft as the most destructive virus ever. This virus was discovered by McAfee yesterday , and there is no repair yet for this kind of virus. This virus simply destroys the Zero Sector of the Hard Disc, where the vital information is kept. COPY THIS E-MAIL, AND SEND IT TO YOUR FRIENDS. REMEMBER: IF YOU SEND IT TO THEM, YOU WILL BENEFIT ALL OF US.

It was a true honer to have Gary on my sheep hunt. He went scouting with me a time or two and was right their on the mountain. Gary was at my shop Monday for me to install a new awning and was headed to Young just as soon as I was done for a wildlife project. He asked me about using Amber to haul supplies into a remote area for yet another project. He only knows one speed and that is fast forward for Animals and Kids. Congratulations Gary You deserve it

Microwaving Water! A 26-year old man decided to have a cup of coffee. He took a cup of water and put it in the microwave to heat it up (something that he had done numerous times before). I am not sure how long he set the timer for, but he wanted to bring the water to a boil. When the timer shut the oven off, he removed the cup from the oven. As he looked into the cup, he noted that the! water was not boiling, but suddenly the water in the cup "blew up" into his face. The cup remained intact until he threw it out of h is hand, but all the water had flown out into his face due to the build up of energy. His whole face is blistered and he has 1st and 2nd degree burns to his face which may leave scarring. He also may have lost partial sight in his left eye. While at the hospital, the doctor who was attending to him stated that this is a fairly common occurrence and water (alone) should never be heated in a microwave oven. If water is heated in this manner, something should be placed in the cup to diffuse the energy such as a wooden stir stick, tea bag, etc., (nothing metal). It is however a much safer choice to boil the water in a tea kettle. General Electric's Response: Thanks for contacting us, I will be happy to assist you. The e-mail that you received is correct. Microwaved water and other liquids do not always bubble when they reach the boiling point. They can actually get superheated and not bubble at all. The superheated liquid will bubble up out of the cup when it is moved or when something like a spoon or tea bag is put into it To prevent this from happening and causing injury, do not heat any liquid for more than two minutes per cup After heating , let the cup stand in the microwave for thirty seconds before moving it or adding anything into it. Here is what our local science teacher had to say on the matter: "Thanks for the microwave warning. I have seen this happen before. It is caused by a phenomenon known as super heating. It can occur anytime water is heated and will particularly occur if the vessel that the water is heated in is new, or when heating a small amount of water (less than half a cup). What happens is that the water heats faster than the vapor bubbles can form. If the cup is very new then it is unlikely to have small surface scratches inside it that provide a place for the bubbles to form. As the bubbles cannot form and release some of the heat has built up, the liquid does not boil, and the liquid conti nues to heat up well past its boiling point. What then usually happens is that the liquid is bumped or jarred, which is just enough of a shock to cause the bubbles to rapidly form and expel the hot liquid. The rapid formation of bubbles is also why a carbonated beverage spews when opened after having been shaken." If you pass this on you could very well save someone from a lot of pain and suffering.

YES, But only on one application. Better start with Desert and maybe in 20 years you'll get one.

You know how the song goes Tim. Has he and his bride left? or have they returned

r u talkin bout the 20-70x70 if u r dont use it on anything higher than 65 otherwise u can hardly see.

GET A JOB, BRO! I am too yung YOU did not mean to post that did you? At your age I was WORKING for what I wanted and that cute little Red Head down the road My god she was Hot Grab a lawn mower, and go clean some rest rooms.

Troy (everyone) you are right, there will aways be those (Hunters??) Because it is a get away for them and they have enjoyed it for years. Every year, another one from that group is going to say, Dude I just aint got the extra cash this time. That will start to break down those groups. Hunting in Az it getting pretty pricey and I do not have a REAL big problem with that. If we continue to have to put the funds up front than the guys that put in on a whem (Bill?) Will stop putting in INCREASE OPPORTUNITY FOR HUNTERS I have nothing bad to say about out of state hunters But you local out of stater's should agree with me even more. This will increase your chances more than residents

Guys, I have brought this up before and I just can not understand why you want an online App. process. Yes, it makes life easier and yes, you do not have to put the money up front. That is the problem We, the members of this and other sites are more devoted to hunting than those that do not think about hunting until some friend of a friend says "Hey guys, lets put in for Deer, Elk, whatever, It will only cost us $7.50 and if we get drawn we can get away from the Wives and go drink beer and blast away at something if we see it while driving down the road. As long as there is not an online process you have a greater chance of drawing a tag. Think about it. Now we could have an online but lets pay for the tag upfront to keep the riff-raff out of the draw. ?? my $.02

Check in stations are not the answer They can not fund checkins and If they tell me I have to spend another $50.00 bucks to drive to Mesa to have my Deer checked, It AINT happen'n I will give it to Amanda for the site first. On line mandatory survey

Glad none of the NEW hunters like the taste of Deer. An hour of downed with the hide on and you can kiss it goodbye. Thats OK, we had 2000 people in the field

Thats the part I do not like. It is just what AZ did and allows anyone to apply without any monetary loose unless drawn. Ok, $7.50 App Fee. GF wants hunter recruitment. The only ones who can recruit NEW hunters are OLD hunters. PERIOD> GF can do all the advertising and increased opportunities they want but if there is not an educated hunter to steer a young hunters in the right direction and offer him (her) a FUN time than they will not have recruitment. Who wants to go to their favorite spot just to have some (I am going to catch He!! for this) PUNK from the Valley who has never hunted before come riding up on a quad, (he barrowed) see a Deer you have been working on for 2 hours and start blasting lead at it at 500 yards. I am not saying that we should not find new hunters who did not grow up in a hunting lifestyle but that if we are going to bring up a new generation of hunters they should be ones that really want to hunt, not just put in because the friend of so-and-so who got to hunt one time because his friends so-in-so said "hey, lets put in since it will only cost us $7.50"

Good point on the CC laws. I have not put in for other states, What do they do?

You may be right that others think chances are better like I do buy that should only last a year or two and then the HUNTERS (should?) have a better chance. Yes Sir it hurts to put the money up front but with the increase in permit #'s this may just help to keep the woods Safer and with respectful hunters. Pay by check with the money you stashed all year or put it on a CC now or when they hit you for it does not make a difference. Unless you had just gone down and bought a new fridge, maxed out your card and just lost the hunt of a lifetime and lost all your bonus points. I will pay up front

Well DB maybe we should compare the mailing lists we are on Get after it Tony. Make your contacts and let us know.

Maybe this is the work of a GOOD IT guy If this bill passed and it is BS we have a good tool to discredit the founders and get it over turned. Hard to give a tree a good hug with only one arm

Email Address: AZGFD<e-news@azgfd.gov>

Yes it came directly to me. It looks like It came from GF. If you want to PM me your Email Address I could forward it to you. Might be some funny stuff going on.

Arizona Game and Fish Department This update from the Teaming with Wildlife Coalition is provided courtesy of the Arizona Game and Fish Department Commission. Teaming with Wildlife is a coalition of more than 5,000 public, private and nonprofit organizations working to prevent wildlife from becoming endangered by supporting increased federal and state funding for wildlife conservation. For more information, visit teaming.com. News May 29, 2008 Sign-on letter for climate change bill Your help is needed! Please sign-on and circulate the attached letter supporting wildlife funding in the climate change bill that is coming to the Senate floor next week. Senator Boxer (D-CA), Chair of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, just last week released a new version of the Climate Security Act [originally drafted by Senators Lieberman (I-CT) and Warner (R-VA)]. This bill is coming to the Senate floor for a vote next week. We need to get the word out that the conservation community and Teaming with Wildlife is pleased with the inclusion of significant and critically needed funding for the wildlife action plans, and other efforts to prevent wildlife from becoming endangered. More information on the revised bill is below, and the sign-on letter is attached. WHEN: The deadline is Friday, May 30, 2008, so that it can be delivered the following Monday before voting begins. WHO: All Teaming with Wildlife groups. WHAT: Sign-on Letter (see below). HOW: Send organization’s name and a note saying “SIGN ME UP” to brockbankd@nwf.org. More information: The Climate Security Act recognizes the critical need for an investment in our natural resources to help wildlife and ecosystems survive global warming. Through its cap and trade mechanism, the Climate Security Act auctions off pollution permits to industries that emit carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. Five percent of the total value of these permits is given to natural resource agencies to protect wildlife from global warming. This funding for natural resource agencies will increase over time as the cap on carbon drives the price up. The money will be dedicated and not subject to the annual appropriations process. What does this mean? The total amount of funding - while crucial - is unprecedented. Between 2012 and 2030, $137 billion ($7.2 billion per year) would be dedicated to wildlife and natural resources. Over 40 percent of this (or $2.99 billion per year) would go to state fish and wildlife agencies with the remainder going to the Land and Water Conservation Fund and federal natural resource agencies. The money to states would be distributed through the Wildlife Conservation and Restoration account of the Pittman-Robertson Fund for global warming adaptation measures, and would require only a 10 percent match from states. Please join Teaming with Wildlife steering committee members, Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, National Wildlife Federation, The Wildlife Society, AZA, The Nature Conservancy, and National Audubon Society on the attached letter supporting these provisions in the Climate Security Act. To show your support, please email Derek Brockbank at brockbankd@nwf.org and let him know the name of your organization and that you wish to sign the letter. ______________________________________________________________________ May XX, 2008 Dear Senator: On behalf of our organizations’ millions of members, we urge Congress to pass legislation that addresses the challenge of climate change by significantly reducing emissions of greenhouse gases and by providing the new investments necessary to protect America’s fish, wildlife, and other natural resources in the face of this unprecedented challenge. In particular, we commend the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act (S. 3036) for including the Adaptation Programs for Natural Resources (Title VI, Subtitle D and Title XII, Subtitles C and D). These important subtitles recognize the need to incorporate climate science and policy direction into natural resources conservation planning and provide the investment in natural resources conservation necessary to address climate change’s unavoidable impacts. Climate change poses the most significant threat to the natural world ever seen in the course of human history. Scientists warn what natural resources managers, hunters, anglers, and other outdoor recreationists already know: global warming is causing serious damage and disruptions to wildlife and ecosystems. Furthermore, climate scientists predict that such harmful disturbances will accelerate and worsen. These impacts include: changes in seasonal events that disrupt fish and wildlife populations and ecological communities; melting of polar ice caps; acidification of the oceans; declining snowpack; increased drought; warming of rivers, streams, lakes and estuaries; increased threat from invasive species; habitat shifts northward and upward in elevation; and more frequent catastrophic fires. Each of these impacts poses a serious threat to the natural resource base that supports both people and wildlife. The natural systems that provide us with drinking water, flood protection, food, medicine, timber, recreational opportunities, scenic beauty, jobs, and numerous other services are at great risk. Addressing these challenges will require an unprecedented new investment in strategies and activities that enhance the resiliency and sustainability of fish, wildlife and their habitats to climate change. We commend S. 3036 for including the Adaptation Programs for Natural Resources which recognize the magnitude of this challenge and dedicate a portion of allowance auction proceeds in a balanced and accountable manner to fish, wildlife, and habitat conservation efforts that address global warming’s impacts. The balanced approach adopted in these subtitles direct funding to federal, state, and tribal natural resources agencies for a variety of conservation efforts, under the guidance of science-based federal and state natural resources adaptation plans. This vital funding would be used for carrying out activities, including research, education, and planning, that assist fish and wildlife and their habitats in becoming more resilient and adapting to the impacts of climate change. Adaptation activities would include providing the necessary resources for federal and state land and water managers to ensure the nation’s complex network of federal and state lands, including parks and refuges, preserves, and forests, and the nation’s water resources, such as estuaries, rivers, lakes and wetlands, are able to adapt to climate change’s impacts. These subtitles also place special emphasis on: the protection of important habitat and species migration corridors through the Land and Water Conservation Fund and Forest Legacy Program; programs that partner with landowners to restore and protect species on privately-owned lands; conservation of tribal lands; and coastal and estuarine habitat restoration efforts – all of which face increasing challenges due to global warming and inadequate federal, state, and tribal resources to meet those challenges. These subtitles recognize that federal, state and tribal natural resources agencies are on the front lines of conservation efforts to help fish, wildlife and ecosystems survive global warming and provide the resources those agencies desperately need to meet that challenge. While recognizing that many of S. 3036’s provisions are still being debated, this legislation represents a needed step forward in addressing the underlying causes of climate change and a strong commitment to providing the policy direction and investment needed to conserve the natural resources that fish, wildlife, and people depend upon. Given what is at risk of being lost, this investment is urgently needed. We urge Congress to pass strong climate change legislation that protects and restores our natural resources legacy - the basis of a strong and healthy society - for our children and future generations. Sincerely, Adirondack Council Alaska Wilderness League Alliance for the Great Lakes Animal Protection of New Mexico Animal Protection Voters Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies Association of Zoos and Aquariums Audubon Florida Audubon New York Audubon Ohio Black Bear Conservation Committee Carbon Free Girl Coalition to Restore Coastal Louisiana Connecticut Forest and Park Association Conservation Council for Hawaii Defenders of Wildlife Delaware Audubon Delaware Greenways Delaware Native Plant Society Environmental League of Massachusetts Everglades Foundation Freshwater Future Friends Committee on National Legislation Friends of White Clay Creek State Park Great Lakes Sport Fishing Council Great Old Broads for Wilderness Gulf Restoration Network Illinois Council of Trout Unlimited Illinois Division, Izaak Walton League of America Indiana Wildlife Federation Kansas Wildlife Federation Kent County Conservancy (Delaware) Lake Erie Region Conservancy Lousiana Wildlife Federation Missouri Smallmouth Alliance National Audubon Society National Parks Conservation Association National Wildlife Federation Natural Resources Council of Maine New Mexico Trout New Mexico Wilderness Alliance Ohio Division, Izaak Walton League of America Passaic River Coalition PennFuture Pennsylvania Interfaith Climate Change Campaign Pew Environment Group Potomac Conservancy River Alliance of Wisconsin River Valley Wildlife Federation, Arkansas Rocky Mountain Recreation Initiative Santa Fe Interfaith Alliance for Environmental Stewardship Sheep Mountain Alliance Tennessee Clean Water Network Texas Conservation Alliance The Nature Conservancy The Nature Conservancy of West Virginia The Wilderness Society The Wildlife Society The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation Torne Valley Preservation Association Trout Unlimited, Wisconsin State Council Union of Concerned Scientists Upper Chattahoochee Riverkeeper Vermont Natural Resources Council Virgin Islands Conservation Society West Branch Conservation Association West Virginia Council of Trout Unlimited Western Lake Erie WATERKEEPER® Association Western Nebraska Resources Council (WNRC) WildEarth Guardians Wildlands Project Wildlife Center of Virginia Wisconsin Wildlife Federation The Senate letter is being led again by Senators Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) and John Warner (R-VA). The House is being led by Congressmen Mike Thompson (D-CA), Jim Saxton (R-NJ), Ron Kind (D-WI), and Robin Hayes (R-NC). Ron Kind is one of the current co-chairs of the Congressional Sportsmen’s Caucus; several of the others are past chairs. -0-