Jump to content

fish

Members
  • Content Count

    43
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About fish

  • Rank
    Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    somewhere between 24b and unit 1
  1. I have successfully figured out how to get the overlay loaded as a transparent map instead of tracks.(this allows the whole state and does not take up precious track log space) Now I just have to figure out a way that I can send out the files to you all. Turning out to be a little more difficult than expected. I have tried this before. You look like you were successful however. You must have converted the .shp or .kmx or whatever you used to a .img file right? The only way I found to make this file is with software that isn't free. I ended up uploading some boundaries on my GPS as a track, but as you know this takes a lot of memory.
  2. fish

    Sold

    i wish my wall tent had a zipper door- this is a heck of a deal and that porch is really nice. I would be all over it if i didn't already have such a similar setup. Good luck with the sale- should go quick!
  3. i got myself the canvas and then bought a angle kit. Made the frame myself with conduit from depot- Takes my bother and I all off 15 min to setup. Be patient and expand your search. you wont find a good deal in the valley.
  4. fish

    Jaguar Pictures.

    awesome pics-thank you so much for sharing.
  5. Update: The owner of the pack saw this pack on CW and has contacted me. I have confirmed that it belongs to him and will be gettting it back to him asap! Thanks CW Jeff
  6. found in the middle of the road- it was not dropped during a stalk or anything like that. Letting the WM know as well. Hope I can get this pack home.
  7. Found a pack over the weekend in unit 1- If you lost a pack pm me when and where you lost it, along with all the details of the pack. Would love to get this back to the owner EDIT::: The owner has contacted me after seeing the add on the site- Thanks CW
  8. fish

    Bears and Deer

    Black bears are oportunstic feeders. Thier diet primarly consists of soft mass, grass, forbes, and ants ( generally speaking for az) A bear will take deer if given the chance, but only if the oportunty presents itself and the energy investment is minimal. Typically they are better suited for investing engery into foraging rather than hunting, so the answer is no- a healthy bear population should not have an effect on the deer population.
  9. fish

    Trapper

    reason i didnt like it was from a leg hold was becuase 1- cat dont general chew off thier feet 2- youll never snare a big cat on its hind foot. Thats my .02 on it
  10. fish

    Trapper

    you obviously dont know anything about trapping cats.. i know your refering to that previous post but there is absolutley no way that cat lost its foot in a trap
  11. The state of Arizona faces a formidable budget deficit, and options to balance the budget are becoming more limited. On January 15, the Governor’s office released a budget plan that proposes to permanently eliminate the Arizona Game and Fish Department’s voter-approved $10 million Heritage Fund and redirect all Arizona State Lottery revenue to the state’s general fund. That proposal has been sent for consideration by the Legislature. Adoption of this proposal would have significant impacts not just to wildlife and outdoor recreationists, but ripple effects extending to Arizona’s land use and growth that is going to be vital for the state’s economic recovery and future well being. Game and Fish is one of the few state agencies that operates as a business based on a “user pay/user benefit” model and poses no burden to the taxpayers. While the Department recognizes that the Governor and Legislature must consider all options, it is our duty and statutory responsibility to ensure that our customers — those who have supported our agency in its mission to conserve Arizona’s wildlife and provide outdoor recreation opportunities — are aware of the impacts that this loss of funding would have on them. Loss of this funding would affect Arizona in many ways: • Without the department representing the state’s interests as the voice of reason at the table, federal agencies and special interest groups with a penchant for litigation will have ever-increasing influence on Arizona’s wildlife, land use and water policy decisions – with the potential for increased restrictions to renewable energy, home and business development, and outdoor recreation. • Without funding to obtain good biological data, it is likely more wildlife species will be federally listed and the cost to manage and mitigate for them would increase. • Programs that directly affect Arizona’s sportsmen, including law enforcement, public land access, game and sportfish management, habitat enhancement and shooting ranges, would be reduced, and revenues from hunters and anglers would have to be stretched once again (as they were before the Heritage Fund came into being) to help meet the critical needs of all wildlife. • The department would lose its primary funding mechanism for the recovery and conservation of the state’s most imperiled wildlife, including the bald eagle, California condor, black-footed ferret, Apache trout and Gila trout, jeopardizing the success of many species conservation programs. • The state would lose some of its ability to leverage Federal monies that directly benefit rural businesses and improve watersheds, wildlife habitat and rangeland. • Ranchers throughout the state would lose the benefit of clean-up programs, public land access management and range and land improvements. • Urban wildlife programs that help people deal with nuisance wildlife or to appreciate backyard wildlife would be severely curtailed. • The department’s ability to enhance wildlife viewing opportunities and other outdoor recreation programs would be cut back significantly. • Department biologists would no longer be able to offer urban planners and developers relevant biological data to help guide them in making sustainable land use decisions that include wildlife considerations. • The department’s Heritage grant program – which has awarded 640 grants totaling $12 million since the early ‘90s -- would be eradicated, which in turn would eliminate a funding source for wildlife conservation, outdoor recreation and environmental education projects that benefit local communities statewide. Did you know? • If the Heritage Fund were lost, Game and Fish would reduce or eliminate programs that generate $2.3 billion in total expenditures on wildlife-related recreation in Arizona. • Heritage funding has contributed nearly 18,000 acres for public enjoyment, wildlife conservation and establishment of wildlife areas statewide and maintains access to over 2 million acres of land for outdoor recreation. • The Department uses Heritage Fund dollars to help manage more than 800 native wildlife species. • The Heritage Fund has provided environmental education programs in the schools initially through Project Wild and now through Focus Wild AZ, which is a Web-based K-12 curriculum. • With the help of the Heritage Fund, a highly successful voluntary non-lead ammunition and hunter outreach program was implemented to enhance California condor conservation. • With the help of the Heritage Fund, Native Apache trout have been down-listed to a threatened species and recovered to a point that allows fishing opportunities and are on the verge of becoming the first native fish in the nation to come off the endangered species list. Passed in 1990 by an overwhelming 2-1 bi-partisan vote, the Heritage Fund provides essential funding for conserving Arizona’s wildlife and is one of the Department’s primary funding sources. The Heritage Fund makes a difference in communities across Arizona and benefits all citizens. We are providing this information to inform and educate our constituents on what the loss of the Heritage Fund might mean to them and to Arizona.
×