Jump to content

MRL1984

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    538

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MRL1984

  1. Posted · Report reply

    Well we sure don't have probable cause of poaching from this photo. We might have it for feeding wildlife, assuming Pima has 280K residents. Here is a statute for feeding wildlife.

     

    13-2927. Unlawful feeding of wildlife; classification

    A. A person commits unlawful feeding of wildlife by intentionally, knowingly or recklessly feeding, attracting or otherwise enticing wildlife into an area, except for:

    1. Persons lawfully taking or holding wildlife pursuant to title 17 or pursuant to rules or orders of the Arizona game and fish commission.

    2. Public employees or authorized agents acting within the scope of their authority for public safety or for wildlife management purposes.

    3. Normal agricultural or livestock operational practices.

    4. Tree squirrels or birds.

    B. This section applies in a county with a population of more than two hundred eighty thousand persons.

    C. Unlawful feeding of wildlife is a petty offense.

  5. Posted · Report reply

    Yall crack me up sometimes. What difference does it make if the scammer is blocked and/or outed? Unless you go archery talk style its a waste of time. (Even that is a waste of time since most CWT deals are FTF and not mail like AT.) I bet the account will have a total of 0 posts from now to the end of the earth even without he block.

     

    Wanted to add there is a R5 308 on AZ shooting if you have enough posts to access the classifieds.

    • Like 2

  8. Posted · Report reply

    I have had a 7 Rem Mag since I was 11 with a good break. Its a 700 BDL synthetic stainless. Kicked less than the m77 ruger 243 I had as a kid.

     

    I think all kids should wear plugs for all shooting. I lost a lot of hearing in my left ear from shooting rifles and shotgun. I don't shoot anything without plugs now.

  16. Posted · Report reply

    To those that think energy isn't important I have this question for you. You are a cop. You have a choice between a 9mm (which is widely known to have great penetration) or a .40 S&W to carry. Which do you choose? I'm willing to bet that better than 9 out of 10 cops (who know their stuff when it comes to sidearms), and you if you are smart, will pick the .40. The reason is simple. It has more knockdown power and creates more damage due to the energy conveyed to the target. Yeah ... someone is going to say that Special Forces carries 9's. I know. They have a different aim in mind.

    The trend for officers is 9mm and most departments are going to 9 nationwide. The FBI is going back now as well. The new bullets are earning their keep. Given the choice I would gladly carry a Glock 34 on patrol. Remember in law enforcement shot on target is number 1 priority for the officer and department since misses cost millions.

     

    We all know a 40 is a neutered 10mm. Which was developed because the FBI wanted a 10 without the recoil so everyone could shoot well enough to qualify. So cops in the know according to you should carry a 10mm for that touch more energy.

     

    Last I checked Special Forces mission purpose is to kill things and break stuff with extreme efficiency. Not sure what other aim they have...

  25. Posted · Report reply

     

     

    Outstanding! Anyone else hear the chorus from a Radiohead song right now?

    No not radiohead...Filter makes sense though. Especially if it's "hey man nice shot".
    It was and I'm more than a little embarrassed. I won't even edit my previous post as punishment.

    Haha awesome! No need to be embarrassed.

×