cactusjack

Here is a copy of the letter I sent to Game and Fish, the Gov office, my State Senator, Pres of the Senate, 4 diff media outlets, and a couple ADA groups. Please contact Game and FIsh and make your opinion known. Even if you disagree with me, you have an opinion, its wrong 😂, but express it just the same. there are many reasons besides lack of strength to draw a bow that can cause someone to be unable to draw, hold, aim and release accurately an arrow. In my case I have nerve damage/neuropathy, essential tremors, shoulder injuries, and an auto immune connective tissue problem that causes my ligaments and tendons to rip away where they are supposed to be. Its not a strength problems. 3 shoulder surgeries to put things back in place forced me to look at other options. My surgeon at the VA was the person who told me about the program. The VA has been pushing disabled vets to get back to doing what we did prior to our injuries, especially outdoors with our friends and families. It sometimes requires adaptive means. Taking away options because some people have abused it, doesn't seem like a good idea. Go after the bad players. I know its extreme but Lets get rid of all handicap parking because some people inherited their grandparents old placards or lied..... https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScYIhOra-8hsDSgR8mjOmG99pSydNfhvrvufWo8B3zbBRfAtg/viewform rulemaking@azgfd.gov Subject: why is AZ Game and Fish taking away hunting opportunities from disabled hunters that are not disabled enough Arizona Game and Fish Department 5000 W. Carefree Hwy Phoenix, AZ 85086 Subject: Opposition to Repeal of R12-4-216 and Advocacy for Equitable Hunting Opportunities Dear Arizona Game and Fish Department, I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed repeal of R12-4-216 and the growing discourse surrounding crossbow use in archery-only hunts. As a committed advocate for equitable and fair hunting practices, I believe this change could alienate and disadvantage certain hunters, particularly those with physical disabilities who rely on crossbows as their legal method of take. The argument that crossbow technology has advanced beyond "standard archery equipment" does not hold when weighed against the progress of other hunting technologies. Compound bows to high-powered scopes, technological advancements have benefited all hunters across the board, offering more ethical and efficient harvesting opportunities. Singling out crossbows is an inconsistent and inequitable stance. If technology is a concern, should we not then limit compound bows, inline muzzleloaders, or range finders? Clearly, this approach is neither practical nor fair. Furthermore, statistical claims about the increased number of crossbow hunters are misleading when contextualized with Arizona's growing population and hunter demographics. With a population increase of 9.9% since 2015 and more individuals entering the sport, a proportional rise in crossbow permits is inevitable. The 1.3% of permit holders using crossbows represents a minor fraction of the total hunters and cannot reasonably be classified as a problem. Assertions regarding quick harvests and over-the-counter (OTC) unit closures fail to account for practical realities. Disabled hunters with crossbows are more likely to act on their opportunities due to limited mobility, while other hunters often prioritize trophy harvests, which extends hunting durations. It’s worth noting that nearly half of the OTC units remain open, debunking the notion of widespread closures due to crossbow use. Recommendations: Refinement of the CHAMP and Crossbow Permit Application Process: Introduce stricter accountability for medical professionals authorizing crossbow permits to ensure legitimate use. Transition to Draw-Based Archery Deer Seasons: Implement a system where all hunters, regardless of method of take, compete equally through a draw process for archery tags. This ensures fairness and mitigates concerns about overharvest by a specific group. Public Representation and Transparency: Include representation from crossbow and CHAMP permit holders in stakeholder discussions to ensure their perspectives are considered in decision-making processes. Arizona Game and Fish has worked hard to build rapport with non-hunting constituencies. Repealing R12-4-216 without adequately addressing concerns risks damaging the Department's reputation and undoing years of effort to foster public support for responsible wildlife management. I urge you to reconsider the proposed changes and instead work toward solutions that maintain equitable opportunities for all hunters, honoring the diversity and inclusivity that defines Arizona's outdoor heritage. Thank you for considering my concerns. I am confident Arizona Game and Fish will act in the best interest of all stakeholders. Sincerely, Steve

Im against the sale of our public land HUNDO-Percent. That being said, the map we are looking at is not from the bill, it is has been produced by conservation groups Other conservation groups have calculated the amount and mapped the locations of BLM and Forest Service land that would be eligible for sale under Lee’s bill. It totals 120 million acres across 11 Western states. This map visualizes the 250+ million acres of public lands eligible for sale in the Senate budget reconciliation package. If they want to get rid of the land, give it to the states. As to which party is responsible, my take is there is only 1 party, its Big Money. Both the Dems and Repubs take money from the same people. They don't care about us until its election time. They promise, blame, make excuses, ect, just so they can stay at the feeding trough. Picture if you will WWF Wrestling. The promotor decides what each side fights/stands for, and the battle rages on. Back stage they just share the loot. And plan the next battle. Who are Sen Lee's donors? Developers I bet are some of the big ones. The BLM, Forest Service, and National Parks lands are to be managed by the rules set up in the 1976 Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA), lots of words.............. Congress recognized the value of the public lands, declaring that these lands would remain in public ownership. Land can be sold, but its not supposed to be unless it falls into one of 3 categories They are scattered, isolated tracts that are difficult or uneconomic to manage; They were acquired for a specific purpose and are no longer needed for that purpose; or Disposing of them will serve important public objectives, such as community expansion or economic development. I dont trust Sen Lee to decide for us....

Definitely feel free to post your pics and comments. When I first got interested in suppressors, I had so many ideas from what I had heard over the years. I had a friend induct me into the cult, and since I have been helping others become addicts as well. I'm not the absolute authority on all things NFA, but I have a solid base and all my own opinions. Mostly based on facts-as I see them, others based on what I have heard. Suppressors have changed so much in the 15+ years I have been doing this, and so has the process to own them. They have lightened my pocketbook, but really helped me enjoy shooting/hunting with my family and friends. I am available to answer questions. I work at a shop and obviously we do it the best, however I actually don't care where you get started, I want people to be informed and be happy with their purchase. Im inserting a couple pics of things I uploaded on CWT over the years. Just for fun... Enfield_Innovative_Arms_integral_45acp_2_(2).mp4

I certified 2 this morning, a scythe and a spectr9. The times have been erratic. Was down to 24 hours in some cases, but 2 to 3 days was common. Lately we have been 2 to 3 weeks, but still have some 2 to 3 days pop up. Typical government operation.

SilencerShop has many tax free, or a 200 dollar credit also. With the fast turn around that has been going on, you can go to a place with a Kiosk and you could be approved in under 2 weeks. Get them in time for your deer and elk hunts

Don't pay more. Silencercentral sucks. They also were fighting to keep suppressors on the NFA.

I have a Salvo12. My brother in law has the JK ones and I know a couple guys with the RexSilentium Seg12s. I like the Salvo12s the best. Then the RexSilentium and dont like the JKs

That is the most compassionate response and thank you.

That is what has been proposed. 30day comment period starts July 1

Bowhtr, I agree that things have long since passed the point of being primitive. Get ready for the flood of used Garmin sights, magnified lenses and clarifiers. OTC deer tags are the next target.

I loved my Nallo3. Great tents.

The comment period for proposed rule change starts in July, goes for 30 days. Proposed changes. Cancel all current Crossbow permits and CHAMP permits- everyone will have to recertify under the new requirements. Only medical doctors that specialize in certain fields can sign now. Orthopedic and DO's were the 2 proposed. No more chiropractor, nurse practitioner or physician assistants. Crossbow permits are only good for 1 year. CHAMP are permanent. No more magnified optics or red dots on crossbows. - to which Commissioner Buchanan added that they should " look at all the primitive weapon seasons". Mentioned Garmin gps, red dots and magnified sights being on compound bows. Then he went on to mention muzzleloaders with optics shooting 500 to 800 meters. So good job Pope and Young and Az Record Book, playing with matches in the barn. No more tripods or bipods for Crossbow permit holders. The CHAMP permit holders use of them was not really clear. I don't think this one will fly. My take away, had Pope and Young and Az Record Book focused on who certified both Crossbow and CHAMP permits, and had not pulled the Technology thread, it would have approved in May. My VA Orthopedic surgeon told me about the program, printed out my permit paperwork and signed it. I wasn't aware of the other issues in both the CHAMP and Crossbow permit groups. Most of the people who have legitimate reasons for the permits would have been ok with it. And yes, the phrase primitive weapon seasons was used.

Who cut and threaded it?

Hopefully the Senate will follow the lead of the House and we won't need any more tax stamps!

Duratouch is a bad touch

Found a radio off a road last fall. I forgot about it until this morning. I dont know how long it was out there or if it works, but if is yours or you are someone has these radios and can check it/charge it, I will gladly pass it on.

no longer have the radio. Thank you for the interest.

Im not disputing the fact that they do not consider crossbows huntingbows. That was a given. Im pointing out that is the only part of Pope and Young they are concerned with.

Congratulations. Any questions im available to try to answer

Crossbow permits were good until Jan 2026, so all the Fall hunts were covered. I agree that they are probably going to do the same thing anyway. I did think it's funny that Commissioner Buchanan referred to the Pope and Young definition of archery equipment. He did miss the part of electronic equipment on bows. Electronic or battery-powered devices shall not be attached to a hunting bow, with the exception of recording devices that cast no light towards the target and do not aid in rangefinding, sighting or shooting the bow. So if we are against technology, and following the rules of Pope and Young, By the use of electronic devices for attracting, locating or pursuing game or guiding the hunter to such game, or by the use of a bow or arrow to which any electronic device is attached with the exception of lighted nocks and recording devices that cast no light towards the target and do not aid in rangefinding, sighting or shooting the bow. Garmin sights, illuminatedsights, radios and Onx are used, ban them too?

Suppressors transfer from manufacturers to dealers on a form 3. Only dealers that have a SOT can transfer suppressors that are on a form 3. You have an option to do paper forms, old school or e-file . E-file has been really fast. Paper forms have been taking 9 months. Privately owned suppressors that are on a form 4 may be sold to a person in the same state on another form 4. If the person is out of state, it has to go to a form 3, at a SOT, then transferred to a dealer in the new state, on the form 3. The new dealer will transfer it on a form 4 to the new owner. Each time a nfa item transfers involving a form 4, it costs 200. So form 4 in state costs 200. One out of state is 400, plus any dealer fees. Privately owned form 4 to form 4, currently can only be done on paper form 4s. So plan on waiting 9 months.

I tried to send you a pm, but your box is full

If you need any help with the transfer, I can help.

Is it on a form 4 or form 3

Pushed back, 3 to 2 vote.