MMACFIVE
Members-
Content Count
724 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by MMACFIVE
-
I’ll have to redo the math. I agree it needs at least the 85. Remember the 85 is 30x and the 95 is 35x so the exit pupils are similar. I really can’t tell the difference in light performance between the 85 and 95. I prefer the 85 for balance and weight. I like the BTX system enough I’m not interested in the dual spotting scope set up. A good friend took delivery of two Swaro STS 65 HDs with 25-50 eyepieces today for a big eye set up. I might change my mind IF I look through them.
-
I have several friends who use to have the Razor 85. They all have Swaros now.
-
If you do the math the Swaro 95 is about the equivalent of around a 60mm for light gathering after the split. Field experience suggest this is about right.
-
When loaded to factory coal there is about a .5 gr difference in volume between the CM and 260 rem with a 140 gr bullet according to Nosler load data. How the heck are you getting an extra 150fps? Theoretically you would need about a 15 gr different to get that much extra velocity.
-
The 260 rem and the 6.5 creedmore have nearly identical case capacity. It might be easier to find a good CM load and go from there. I’ll bet 40-42 grains of H4350 or IMR 4451 would work well with any of your bullets.
-
This is from a 6.5x55 with 127gr Barnes LRX at 225 yards. MV 3025 fps. Impact velocity 2650 fps. This has been a the normal experience I’ve had from Barnes. Every thing from the original to the TSX, TTSX, and LRX. A rib was hit on entry and exited after almost 3”. We’ve also driven 120gr 7mm TTSX through a cow elk femur and found it in the neck. The LRX/TTSX is my goto bullet just in front of the Accubond. Yes I know they might be a little short on BC but most are good out to 750-900 yards. Or further than I prefer to shoot. BTW: I think Nukka the Goldendoodle was a good decoy!
-
Worried about Barnes expansion...
MMACFIVE replied to MMACFIVE's topic in Rifles, Reloading and Gunsmithing
The gun is a Forbes 24B with an extremely long freebore. It really only shoots done bullet well but it shoots it really well. We’ve kill a couple of bulls with the 127’s and a Creed the last couple of years. Also a couple of bulls with the LRX 129 gr .277. -
I don't think that is a head space issue? did you read my quote for Layne? He doesn't seem to think they are a pain.
-
Are you saying after firing this round it would not rechamber in the same gun? Or were there other steps in between?
-
By coincidence this is from Layne Simpson in Feb 2020 Shooting Times: “There are those among us who break into hives in the presence of a belted case, and while it is not actually needed on most cartridges, I have yet to experience a problem with it. Set the full-length resizing die for head spacing on the shoulder of the case rather than on its belt, and cases last as long as those with no belt.”
-
Belted magnums do not have to head space on the belt. I do not neck size any hunting load. It’s been my experience that when I partially size(i.e. shoulder bump/ i.e. head spacing on the shoulder) that I am also partially resizing the base also regardless of whether it’s belted or not. This has worked for me for many decades and I don’t see a reason to switch now. I agree that a belt is not needed but whether a cartridge has a belt or not does not affect my decision.
-
I agree it’s a sizing issue. Lance is most likely right about a shoulder bump. I have had more then one gun where the resizing die tolerances were not tight enough to reduced the base diameter enough and I’ve have to purchase a “small base die” to get the job done. L Cazador, what did you mean by Expanded head diameter and why does belted magnum matter?
-
$2,600 for 2019 NIB...
-
2019 Swarovski 8x42EL Range: NIB, price reduced for the Weekend $2500
MMACFIVE posted a topic in Classified Ads
Like the title says new/never used Swaro 8x42 EL Range for about $800 less than Outdoorsmans price with tax included. Of course the Outdoorsmans already has their stud included (about $90) so let’s say $700 below.... -
2019 Swarovski 8x42EL Range: NIB, price reduced for the Weekend $2500
MMACFIVE replied to MMACFIVE's topic in Classified Ads
Not a chance. I’ll keep them for that. I’ll get more than $2500 on eBay, I just wanted to try CWT first.... -
2019 Swarovski 8x42EL Range: NIB, price reduced for the Weekend $2500
MMACFIVE replied to MMACFIVE's topic in Classified Ads
Not a lefty huh? -
2019 Swarovski 8x42EL Range: NIB, price reduced for the Weekend $2500
MMACFIVE replied to MMACFIVE's topic in Classified Ads
Meet you in the middle: $2450 -
2019 Swarovski 8x42EL Range: NIB, price reduced for the Weekend $2500
MMACFIVE replied to MMACFIVE's topic in Classified Ads
Times running out. Make an offer. -
2019 Swarovski 8x42EL Range: NIB, price reduced for the Weekend $2500
MMACFIVE replied to MMACFIVE's topic in Classified Ads
I’ll be in Phoenix Tuesday evening to fly out. Reduced to $2500. CWT gets the first shot then they go on eBay when I get home. -
2019 Swarovski 8x42EL Range: NIB, price reduced for the Weekend $2500
MMACFIVE replied to MMACFIVE's topic in Classified Ads
Geez, if these things were 10’s they would be gone the first day. -
2019 Swarovski 8x42EL Range: NIB, price reduced for the Weekend $2500
MMACFIVE replied to MMACFIVE's topic in Classified Ads
https://outdoorsmans.com/collections/binoculars/products/swarovski-el-range-8x42 -
PM sent
-
ttt
-
I wanted to get a shed dog and name it Horn. The wife wouldn’t go for it.
