azhunter42

First one is my old scope leupold vx-ii 39*40. Glass in great shape, has typical few scratches of many years of hunting.120.00obo Second one is my wife's old scope Bushnell elite 3200 3*9*40.90.00obo We both got new scopes, so we no longer need these.

TTT

Leopold is sold

I was up there on my wife's hunt this past October. We were into elk everyday but one. She just couldn't connect on one. I'll be in 7w for my cow elk in two weeks.

Yuppers. I got a new leupold and I got her a new zeiss. We both agreed that it would be our early Christmas gifts to each other.

Not luck, I'm not in Tucson.

I would take it if I was in Tucson.

30 for the accubond and I'll take them?

I'm interested

I was up there last weekend on my wife's cow hunt. We seen three decent size bulls.

We are knew that from the beginning that ADA is all about the money.A bunch of liars who say one thing but do another.They are all waiting to see if another bill that mirrors the 2072 gets pushed thru.When are there members going to drop them?I just don't get why they have not left ADA yet.

Quote: NRA, SCI and CSF Disavow Misleading Press Release Today the National Rifle Association, Safari Club International and the Congressional Sportsmen's Foundation publicly disavowed a misleading press release distributed on Friday, March 11th to congressional offices and other outlets. The press release blatantly misrepresents the position of these organizations regarding legislation to delist gray wolves under the Endangered Species Act. The draft release was circulated by an individual representing Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife and Big Game Forever. The individual representing these two groups was immediately advised to remove the aforementioned organizations named in the release. Unfortunately, he did not, and the release was transmitted without correcting the inaccurate information. The release in question claimed that the NRA, SCI and CSF along with the other organizations listed below are opposed to language relating to the delisting of gray wolves in spending legislation currently pending before the U.S. Congress. In fact, these organizations support that language, as well as every other measure that has been introduced in the U.S. House and Senate to date addressing this important issue. Congressional offices and members of the media should exercise caution in accepting as fact, or repeating, any claims made by Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife, Big Game Forever or any person claiming to represent them. Due to the blatant misrepresentation contained in the press release circulated by these two groups, any claims they make in the future should be thoroughly investigated and independently confirmed.

Come on we all know ADA is in bed with AZSFW.They are not going to bite the hand that feeds them.Its been how many weeks now since they said if AZSFW tried to push 2072 thru again that they would drop them.ADA is playing the usual game on who will give them the most support even though that bill is crap.

I attended both meetings. I did not have much to say. due this all being new to me. I did not like what Ada had to say or better yet what they didn't say. I'm a regular Joe hunter like the rest of you guys/gals. The board could of made a vote that night. They chose to stick with what's best for them not the average Joe. Amanda thankyou very much for allowing our voice to be heard on your site. Ramon

It is was an interesting meeting. Let's see what comes out of it.

So were meeting a bit earlier now I take it?

Ill do my best to attend the meeting Kent.If for some reason I cannot make it ill paypal you the funds. Ramon