ThomC

The online is correct as you go. The program will tell you what you left out. Of course if you try hard enough their are ways to screw up.

aa o never mind. I will exercise "my right" to remain silent because anything I say on the internet could be used against me or cause confusion.

I dont have an opinion on your stories except the use of "my rights". I dont think that anyone has a "right" to kill any animal. It is a privilege and you must follow rules.

See any scratch marks, tracks. Break it open to see what is inside. Most likely a dog.

I have passed a spike elk to get nothing. I have passed a fork Deer to get a 4 point. I am not a trophy hunter. Now days I just want to see a Bull in heat. I just want to get a spike with my bow. Only you can determine what a trophy is to you. You know what trophys do, collect dust. I love to see the old bad mounts you will see in old bars etc. I do not think that if you hire someone to hunt for you that you should brag but that is just me. Beauty is in the mind of the Beer Holder. LOL Remember every post on Fri. PM may be in the mind of the Beer Holder.

Well all I can say this is the result of tooooooooooo dang many people. Are you part of the problem or part of the solution?

You don't have to be lark to say .270. A 7-308 is a weak 308.

My Grandpa said the same thing and now I say it too. The slippery slope is getting steeper and slicker.

A new word was learned "kerfuffle" LOL

Its amazing how much money we all spend on stuff. I bought a pair of Herters 7x35 many many years ago. When I came to AZ I got a pair of Bushnell Customs 7x35 which was top of the line then for $100. I now have a pair of Euro Cabelas 10x42. My Herters are still in the boat. My Bushnells are always in my truck. They are still clear and have found more animals than I can remember. My Euros are in the safe and only come out when I am really serious. Cabelas sells many different binocs. The Euros are the best IMO. It is nice IMO to start with cheaper and work up.

And Now we know the rest of the story. Maybe Ted was on to something with his comments. Oh no, here come the SS breaking down my door.

The USFS think that they own the forest.

FAQS need updating.

Without citing book, chapter and verse from the regs or code, then it's just pure BS. http://thinkexist.com/quotation/what_you_do_not_want_done_to_yourself-do_not_do/202162.html

The 6mm is not a finicky round. I wish it would make a comeback.

It is very hard to get away from those 2 legged creatures. And they multiplying rapidly.

quote "I do believe that started with the right intentions. It was started with the intention to gather funds to fight the political battles." quote I dont. Do a search for Don Peay and you will find out how the SFW is out to get different states into his new method of managing wildlife. It is a bigger deal than the few in AZ. I dont think that the AZ people were that naive. It is a money/control grab. Remember the New Mexico outfitter deal a few years ago? IMHO

If you want alot of opinions you need to define "long shot". Then the fun will begin.

The mistake that the FS made was exposed when people observed that the fire did not burn the WMAF like it did the Sitgraves because the WMAF was properly managed. WMAF managers allow cutting and Sitgraves doesnt. That being said the Wallow fire did not ruin the Forest it just cleaned it up. Expect to see an increase of animals in the Wallow Fire Area. The loss of property is a result of mis-management of the forest over the years because of eco nuts butting in. The Apaches dont have to listen to eco nuts and dont.

You keep saying that you are not defending the ADA or its leader, and then you do. If you are a member of an org. you still have to be very involved in what the org. does. Apathy among org members lets the rogue leader do whatever they want. And that is exactually what happened. IMHO

In order to access the situation we need more info. Are there signs of use? What is the condition of said blind? Does it look abandoned? Who owns the property? Want more advice, ask the WM for the area to access the site. Or, send the location to some trusted people to help access the situation. The best way to safely ruin it is to post the location on the World Wide Web.

The final results of the survey are in an will be published in our newsletter. We owe it to our membership to give them the information of the survey. I have read that there were "trick Questions" in the survey. There were 3 questions. Question 1 was "Are you for the ADA continuing to support the AZSFW?" If you can discover the tricky part, please advise Amanda, since she helped craft some of the questions. As far as the AZSFW, it will continue to exist, but in a far different format and certainly without funding from any of the conservation groups, including the ADA. There is a HB in the legislature which is designed around what can or cannot be said on the internet. I hope that it does not garner support, but CWT would be an interesting place to visit if it does. I must admit that the silver lining is that some people have come out and gotten involved. Don Lee is a good example of what can happen when people get off their collective backsides and get to rolling up their sleeves. I attempted to call all those who voted to NOT support the AZSFW only to thank them for participating in the process. Some folks did not place their names or addresses on the return vote or envelope, but those that did I attempted to contact. As far as responding to CWT, I apologize, but we really do owe you nothing. The ADA will have their annual election in June and we are looking forward to our members attending and having new board members on the slate for a 2 year commitment. Regard, BPJ Well ol BPJ doesnt owe CWT anything but doesnt hesitate to USE CWT to promote his agendi. Typical all for me and the h for you.

F the libs, F the Forest Circus, and F the Catholic church. And I dont want an F apology

They have already spoken. Ask ole BPJ.