-
Content Count
416 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
8
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by PowellSixO
-
I would also consider a 450 fours stroke.
-
Flatline or nothing.
-
4a early archery bull for this guy. Just down the road a bit. Pretty stoked!!
- 66 replies
-
- 2
-
-
- hunting draw
- elk
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
OFFICIAL!! I got a HIT Thread.. Post when you see it
PowellSixO replied to Adicted's topic in The Campfire
The wife or I got hit Saturday. Just checked this morning. Could believe it. Early rifle, or early archery here we come. I'll either be the hunter or the guide this year. At least I'm going to get out there. -
Sold pending funds
-
34mm Seekins Low Rings. Used on rifle for 2 trips to the range. No marks on them. 85 shipped and insured. PayPal preferred. Text me at 435-668-9597, or PM me. Thanks.
-
WTS Vortex viper pst gen 2 5-25×50 mrad ebr-2c
PowellSixO replied to PowellSixO's topic in Classified Ads
Scope is sold. Decided to just give it to my little brother. Thanks for looking. -
I have a like new Gen 2 Pst 5-25×50, ffp, mrad, with Ebr-2c reticle scope for sale. Glass is perfect, scope body is perfect. May have scope ring marks, as I have not removed it from the aero precision one piece rings they have been mounted in yet. I've had this on my gasser 224 valkyrie for exactly 60 rounds, so it hasn't seen extreme recoil. I have the box, sunshade, vortex bubble level, and vortex flip up scope caps all included. Rings NOT included. I'm asking $750 shipped and insured. Prefer PayPal for payment. PM me, or text me at 435-668-9597. Thanks for looking. Edit: Price reduced below.
-
WTS Vortex viper pst gen 2 5-25×50 mrad ebr-2c
PowellSixO replied to PowellSixO's topic in Classified Ads
Scope is off the rifle. It does have very very faint ring marks. They dont show up in the pics. -
WTS Vortex viper pst gen 2 5-25×50 mrad ebr-2c
PowellSixO replied to PowellSixO's topic in Classified Ads
Let's get this sold $675 shipped and insured, and I eat the PayPal fees. This is like new. -
WTS Vortex viper pst gen 2 5-25×50 mrad ebr-2c
PowellSixO replied to PowellSixO's topic in Classified Ads
Would consider trade for Burris XTR ii 4-20x50 or 5-25x50. Must be mrad. -
WTS Vortex viper pst gen 2 5-25×50 mrad ebr-2c
PowellSixO replied to PowellSixO's topic in Classified Ads
Bumpity -
So I've done the research, and I've called game and fish. Their response was "I don't know". Haha. So let's say you find a sweet glassing spot in unit 125, which allows you to glass into unit 126. Your tag is for unit 126. You're glassing opening morning, and the buck or bull you've been waiting for, walks out and gives you a 300 yard shot. The animal is in your unit, but you're in a different unit. Can you shoot it??? You're technically hunting the right unit, and you kill the animal in the right unit, but your take the shot from a different unit. Is that good to go, or is g&f going to slap the cuffs on you???
-
Last thing I have to say, is that I never intended to stir the pot, or get anyone fired up. I really just wanted to know what was truly legal. I found my answer, and I hope it helps someone in the future. Sorry if some feathers got ruffled along the way. 👍
-
https://www.azgfd.com/agency/commission/members/ At the bottom of each person, is a contact link. Contact your commissioners if you don't believe me. Also read the description of their duties at the top of that page. They are the ones to ultimately interpret the laws.
-
I've already spoken to 3 game wardens and they were no help. All they would say is I don't know. See post above!
-
Just spoke with the Commissioner. It IS 100% LEGAL to shoot from one unit into another unit, as long as no other rules are broken. No shooting across roads, structures, and so on. I'm not going to list his name (so a million people don't call him), but all of the commissioners are aware of it. So he said call your local commissioner if you don't believe some crazy guy on Coues Whitetail. It IS LEGAL.
-
What I'm not seeing is the FROM part. You can justify it from either perspective. I can understand it from both sides. What I WANT, is a cut and dry answer here. That's the thing I hate about keyboard warriors. They refuse to try and see a scenario from both sides of the fence. I can see it from your perspective, but you refuse to try and see it from mine. Doesn't make either of us right. I had an hour conversation with an Arizona Game Commissioner, and he didn't know the answer. He didn't criticize me, or say you're wrong because this is the way I feel. He said I see it from my side, and I can see it from your side, let me find out. So why is your opinion on the way you interpret the rules here make it the end all? That's my criticism of your argument. Edit: I'm not trying to be an butt here. I'm not saying I'm right either. And I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm just saying that it is not as cut and dry as you're claiming it is. It definitely leaves room for argument. I'm just wanting a real answer here, not an opinion.
-
I'm waiting on the AZ game commissioners to discuss it, and give me a real answer. I'll post the facts once I find them out, not my biased "my way is the only way" opinion.
-
So from your point of view, it is okay to shoot animal in the wrong unit as long as you're "pursuing" from the same unit as your tag, and "taking" from the same unit as your tag. Your logic works both ways. You're just interpreting it the way YOU want to interpret it. Just saying.
-
Thanks for all the responses. I just found out, i work with one of the Arizona game commissioners. I'm going to contact him next week and get the real scoop. I'll post the results. Thanks again.
-
It's in az. I just didn't want to give specific units, just in case someone had something they thought I was blowing up. I don't even have a tag this year.
-
There we go. Thanks for that.
