trphyhntr

thats a good idea.

id rather lose my loyalty and my bonus point for 2018 if it meant avoiding a poverty tag.No way. Hunt this year's "poverty tag" and then go into 2019 with 2 points. Lose the loyalty and you'll always be behind 1 point for the next 5 years. would depend how many points i have to begin with. if i had like 5 i wouldnt want to lose them on a archery tag.

Dont believe so. It just shows up as "not drawn" yeah you probably dont lose it since you paid the the app fee up front but i could be wrong.

i just signed up 5 years.

id rather lose my loyalty and my bonus point for 2018 if it meant avoiding a poverty tag.

i would get a new card and not update that one if it was me.

go fishing.

every gun regulation is an infringement on the 2a

Does the NFL support the NRA

haters gonna hate.

If Sean Miller had the last name of Clinton, he could eat live babies on national television, and get away with it. The FBI is just as corrupt, as the people they protect from Federal indictments. Lmao

https://imgur.com/a/bNyDX

people are so assbackwards these days. Dana Loesch could shoot me anytime.

im a glutton for punishment.

if someone isnt looking forward to the elk draw its because they suck at elk hunting.

note to self dont get the police involved if i catch the person that steals from me. much rather beat him with baseball bats You must not have much to lose or you don't care to lose it. Trust me the feeling was there. did he get convicted

note to self dont get the police involved if i catch the person that steals from me. much rather beat him with baseball bats

im pretty sure its mostly guys that hike out to high points that are lobbing the furthest shots.

so youre telling me theres a chance...

I'm not saying that this post is set up by an anti hunter or whatever, but I've always wondered if anti hunters ever try to come on this website with new accounts and try to knock hunting in a negative way without saying it. ive called it a few times on here. In a similar spirit to this comment, if we continue to improve the methods of taking game, but dont have anyway to increase the renewable resource of game animals, then arent we bound to hunt ourselves out of opportunity. Aldo Leopold compared this to improving a pump without improving a well. Eventually you will run out of water. I also disagree with the argument that just because a method of take is legal, that it should be embraced by the hunting community. Another Leopold quote was that Ethics were doing the right thing when no one was looking, even when the right thing might be legal. The North American model of wildlife management is based on these principles and the principle of fair chase. Fair chase is also a foundational principle for both P&Y club and B&C. In the past, hunters policed themselves and carried the burden of defining acceptable practice. Today that sentiment has changed greatly. We regularly see comments stating essentially if its legal, dont question it. Perhaps we should be questioning more things amongst ourselves instead of squashing debate. Perhaps we should not declare that our actions are beyond question simply because they are beyond prosecution. Maybe we owe it to ourselves and to future hunters to have the conversation. people kill shoot illegally now just to get likes from strangers on the internet. Ok, whats your point? It's pretty gay.

I'm not saying that this post is set up by an anti hunter or whatever, but I've always wondered if anti hunters ever try to come on this website with new accounts and try to knock hunting in a negative way without saying it. ive called it a few times on here. In a similar spirit to this comment, if we continue to improve the methods of taking game, but dont have anyway to increase the renewable resource of game animals, then arent we bound to hunt ourselves out of opportunity. Aldo Leopold compared this to improving a pump without improving a well. Eventually you will run out of water. I also disagree with the argument that just because a method of take is legal, that it should be embraced by the hunting community. Another Leopold quote was that Ethics were doing the right thing when no one was looking, even when the right thing might be legal. The North American model of wildlife management is based on these principles and the principle of fair chase. Fair chase is also a foundational principle for both P&Y club and B&C. In the past, hunters policed themselves and carried the burden of defining acceptable practice. Today that sentiment has changed greatly. We regularly see comments stating essentially if its legal, dont question it. Perhaps we should be questioning more things amongst ourselves instead of squashing debate. Perhaps we should not declare that our actions are beyond question simply because they are beyond prosecution. Maybe we owe it to ourselves and to future hunters to have the conversation. people kill shoot illegally now just to get likes from strangers on the internet.

i thought a wannabe was someone that sat around watching other dudes play games on tv then talk trash on the internet like theyre on the team.

Sometimes I forget your a grown butt mani stopped growing when I was like 14. My maturity stopped growing then also

Let me guess your the guy with the "DIFFERENT" colored fish That's me in like 25 years if I make it that far.