Flatlander

I am yet to be convinced that every hunter in the state should have to sacrifice the opportunity to hunt or take their kids hunting in order to get some rich guys money. The facts are that all of us should contribute to the level we are able and should not do so at the expense of another. I could not in good conscience use my dollars to take opportunity away from another and call it conservation.

I agree 100% with what you have said. We have to be able to discuss these things without acting like a jackass.

I dont think that I need a great deal of detail to know how to feel about this. I am willing to listen to anything but this is all I think we really need to know: 1. Does the initiative redirect tags from the AZGFD administrated draw process to an outside organization(s) who will sell them to raise additional funds? If the answer is yes, then my question would be how does AZGFD plan to deal with the loss of said funds? My guess would be that they will raise tag fees to make up the difference. 2. What is being done with the funds that AZGFD cannot do themselves right now? Education? Title 17 does not restrict state funds from being used for this purpose, AZGFD can and does use their dollars for educating the general public (ever see those giant billboards with the bighorn sheep on them?). When a political fight comes up, I understand funds are needed to fight that, but that does not occur every year, so what happens in the meantime? 3. Are there other means to raise these funds, that do not require using wildlife as the medium for raising dollars. For instance, most political lobbies are suppprted by the industries they serve. So could the outdoor industry provide goods or services which could be used to raise funds? Are we as sportsman willing to pony up and provide financial suppport? I must say that I do not believe I can be convinced that this is a good idea. But I will listen to what is being proposed. I believe that selling more tags or opportunities for tags to those with more financial means feels like a perversion of the North American Model. The presentation of the initiative feels backhanded to me and that may be feeding my uneasiness. But it appears to me that although this would provide funds for the political fights like we had with HSUS it certainly is not the only way to raise money for these fights, and the bill certainly provides an added benefit to those who have money and those who have businesses that serve those who have money. Selfishly, I could probably afford a few more raffle tickets than most, so I may get a few more tags this way, but I agree, using state resources to raise money for political action does not feel ethical to me. Will be interesting to see how this shakes out. And please if anything I have stated is inaccurate please feel free to correct it.

I dont think that I need a great deal of detail to know how to feel about this. I am willing to listen to anything but this is all I think we really need to know: 1. Does the initiative redirect tags from the AZGFD administrated draw process to an outside organization(s) who will sell them to raise additional funds? If the answer is yes, then my question would be how does AZGFD plan to deal with the loss of said funds? My guess would be that they will raise tag fees to make up the difference. 2. What is being done with the funds that AZGFD cannot do themselves right now? Education? Title 17 does not restrict state funds from being used for this purpose, AZGFD can and does use their dollars for educating the general public (ever see those giant billboards with the bighorn sheep on them?). When a political fight comes up, I understand funds are needed to fight that, but that does not occur every year, so what happens in the meantime? 3. Are there other means to raise these funds, that do not require using wildlife as the medium for raising dollars. For instance, most political lobbies are suppprted by the industries they serve. So could the outdoor industry provide goods or services which could be used to raise funds? Are we as sportsman willing to pony up and provide financial suppport? I must say that I do not believe I can be convinced that this is a good idea. But I will listen to what is being proposed. I believe that selling more tags or opportunities for tags to those with more financial means feels like a perversion of the North American Model. The presentation of the initiative feels backhanded to me and that may be feeding my uneasiness. But it appears to me that although this would provide funds for the political fights like we had with HSUS it certainly is not the only way to raise money for these fights, and the bill certainly provides an added benefit to those who have money and those who have businesses that serve those who have money. Selfishly, I could probably afford a few more raffle tickets than most, so I may get a few more tags this way, but I agree, using state resources to raise money for political action does not feel ethical to me. Will be interesting to see how this shakes out. And please if anything I have stated is inaccurate please feel free to correct it, just be sure to write in crayon.

500cc?

I am sure he appreciates that. Since just the bow package without arrows sells for $350. If you want to low ball the guy, at least do it through a PM.

Wait somebody posted pictures of deer on the site ?!?!?!

I have been thinking of this myself and have been looking at the Promaster 325 and Outdoorsman head. Seems to be a popular pairing.

As I recall Sean, there wasn't any leftover tags for where I like to hunt, unit 29. Never saw zero leftovers before. Were there leftovers in other units? Yes, there were in a handful of units. But the number continues to drop each year. And if or when that list is posted up it will be a giant step towards 0 leftovers. Guys putting those as 3rd and 4th choices will scoop up all those undersubscribed tags.

I am a fan of closed mouth mounts and especially in Javelina. Definitely a more natural look.

There is lots of land to hunt right behind those locked gates. Just walk in and leave the vehicle at the gate. As long as the gate isnt posted you are just fine. Fain Ranch and Deep Well both typically allow walk in access without even needing to contact them. It will be a great hunt. Good luck!

Used iPhone 7. Might be a 7s, I cant remember. It works and in real good shape. Lived in one of those plastic shells with a rubber inner liner. Verizon. $250 or whatever is reasonable, I have no idea what these go for. Located in Gilbert.

Ttt

I have the late archery hunt that immediately follows your hunt. There are no secrets here, I am going to focus on water near the rim. If I was you, Id go where I could set up and glass the junipers. Good luck!

So do I understand that the NR quota was filled, until the card got rejected, then they went back and looked at the 1-2 pass and the next guy in line was a resident? Seems like a crappy way to redistribute that tag.

Which head are you guys using with the promaster carbon fiber tripods? Might as well throw which model of tripod you are rolling out there too.

So... wouldnt that suggest that it wasnt drawn? And why dont they post the NR reports like they did last year?

I was really inpress d with Jacobs Shooting off of the tripod rest. Congrats to everyone, looks like a great day!

Nevermind, still up for sale.

Thats a steal. And my .02 is that you would be downgrading to go with Vipers.

Ok fixed all my posts. Thinking about raising the price now though. So if you want it, better hurry 😉 All PMs replied to.

I just assumed it hadnt been. I am usually wrong, but I never unlocked it, because I didnt have to because its a Verizon phone.

Its a Verizon phone. Not locked.

I think Bob was talking to BC777.

Ttt