Apache7mm Report post Posted Friday at 04:23 PM Latest update. DAN 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CouesFanatic Report post Posted Friday at 04:56 PM Wow, no bag limits. Dan, any truthful info about saving the lake and water rights? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
trphyhntr Report post Posted Friday at 04:59 PM 2 minutes ago, CouesFanatic said: Wow, no bag limits. Dan, any truthful info about saving the lake and water rights? They don’t have any water rights Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
trphyhntr Report post Posted Friday at 05:00 PM That lake would have been filled with 2.5lb crappie and 8lb bass next year. Such a shame. Maybe in another 8 years it will be back Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CouesFanatic Report post Posted Friday at 05:12 PM 12 minutes ago, trphyhntr said: They don’t have any water rights I've read all the rumors, tough to know the truth Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Apache7mm Report post Posted Friday at 05:31 PM My understanding, currently the minimum pool San Carlos is allotted isn't much and thus is "sold" annually. Any other ongoing litigation i have no information on. DAN 2 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
trphyhntr Report post Posted Friday at 06:17 PM 1 hour ago, CouesFanatic said: I've read all the rumors, tough to know the truth I talked to the fish and wildlife at the lake last year for a while and that’s what he told me. Dude seemed pretty knowledgeable. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
n2horns Report post Posted Friday at 08:49 PM 2 hours ago, trphyhntr said: I talked to the fish and wildlife at the lake last year which species in particular did you speak with? Which had more to say the fish or wildlife? Friday humor 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EarlyBronco Report post Posted Friday at 09:08 PM 4 hours ago, trphyhntr said: That lake would have been filled with 2.5lb crappie and 8lb bass next year. Such a shame. Maybe in another 8 years it will be back Maybe with all the 5$ habitat stamps they sold this year they will be able to buy some big crappie and throw them back in there next year Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
trphyhntr Report post Posted Friday at 09:15 PM 5 minutes ago, EarlyBronco said: Maybe with all the 5$ habitat stamps they sold this year they will be able to buy some big crappie and throw them back in there next year That’s what they did last time, hopefully they do it again. Probably not next year, gotta get some water first Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dutchmanazA1 Report post Posted 21 hours ago Man what a shame! It would be nice if the could agree on letting that lake fill for a couple of years and then keep it at least 50% full year around. Seems they could at least keep that much in it once the lake is full. Dreaming is free, right? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dutchmanazA1 Report post Posted 21 hours ago https://nativenewsonline.net/environment/san-carlos-apache-tribe-signs-1-5m-water-agreement-with-bureau-of-reclamation/#:~:text=(photo: San Carlos Recreation and,Project water to our Reservation.” 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
trphyhntr Report post Posted 21 hours ago 21 minutes ago, dutchmanazA1 said: Man what a shame! It would be nice if the could agree on letting that lake fill for a couple of years and then keep it at least 50% full year around. Seems they could at least keep that much in it once the lake is full. Dreaming is free, right? How would they farm with no water? At 50% San Carlos would be bigger than Roosevelt is right now. It does fill up some, when it’s snows in New Mexico Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
trphyhntr Report post Posted 21 hours ago 17 minutes ago, dutchmanazA1 said: https://nativenewsonline.net/environment/san-carlos-apache-tribe-signs-1-5m-water-agreement-with-bureau-of-reclamation/#:~:text=(photo: San Carlos Recreation and,Project water to our Reservation.” What Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jdown Report post Posted 21 hours ago Is it saying the agricultural land is where the lake is today and the creation of the dam flooded that farmland? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
