Duwane Adams ?

[AZBIG10]

I don't know either party involved. It happened like I said before he won't do that again

[4huntrs]

21 minutes ago, WHT_MTNMAN said:

Did I read or watch it wrong?? from what I saw he wasn't even with the hunter??? So how would he know with an ABSOLUTE certainty that he shot from the road. 

He said he had moved to a different location to get another view of the deer. He never argued he didn’t know where the deer was shot from only that he didn’t understand the law pertaining to what defined a road.

[idgaf]

53 minutes ago, TR0UBLE SH00TER said:

That's disputable and it's also irrelevant to his charge.

The law Mr. DeBaca broke is written clear as day.

 

I've linked and listed it below.

https://www.azleg.gov/arsDetail/?title=17

17-309. Violations; classification

16. Possess or transport any wildlife or parts of the wildlife that was unlawfully taken.

 

It is relevant.  if we are going off of the commission's own precedence.  Not knowing was good enough for jed Larsen not to have his license revoked for the much greater crime of taking a trophy  elk on the reservation.  

 

 

[Coues247]

13 minutes ago, idgaf said:

It is relevant.  if we are going off of the commission's own precedence.  Not knowing was good enough for jed Larsen not to have his license revoked for the much greater crime of taking a trophy  elk on the reservation.  

 

 

Even better is AZGFD decided to not even charge Jed. It was all federal. And he definitely knew the elk he possessed was illegal. 

[Heat]

7 hours ago, TR0UBLE SH00TER said:

Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but facts are facts. Posting frivolous arguments to diminish those facts are obvious attempts at damage control. 

There's nothing shady, messy, corrupt or nefarious about charging and convicting a hunting guide for having an illegally taken animal in his vehicle. 

 

 

 

 

Hilarious!

Damage control? Never met Nick Debaca, as if I care.