idgaf Report post Posted 18 hours ago 1 hour ago, 654321 said: Is that what happened because I wasn’t there and never heard the story, you Thats your defense now of A3 now? "I wasn't there, we're you?" I am just making the comparison for the precedent. Either, there's a new sheriff in town or certain people/companies get special exemptions from the rules that are enforced. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
654321 Report post Posted 8 hours ago 10 hours ago, idgaf said: Thats your defense now of A3 now? "I wasn't there, we're you?" I am just making the comparison for the precedent. Either, there's a new sheriff in town or certain people/companies get special exemptions from the rules that are enforced. No defense for A3. Plenty of A3 guides have been busted by AZGFD so your special treatment of A3 is garbage. Here's the bottom-line Adams and his client are on a "buck of a lifetime" Nicks own words. They determine the only way to kill the buck is to shoot from the road and it was at that time they choose to break the rules and shoot from the road rather than let the buck go. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
trphyhntr Report post Posted 4 hours ago 22 hours ago, idgaf said: It is relevant. if we are going off of the commission's own precedence. Not knowing was good enough for jed Larsen not to have his license revoked for the much greater crime of taking a trophy elk on the reservation. Is debaca LDS? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MogollonMan Report post Posted 4 hours ago 3 hours ago, 654321 said: No defense for A3. Plenty of A3 guides have been busted by AZGFD so your special treatment of A3 is garbage. Here's the bottom-line Adams and his client are on a "buck of a lifetime" Nicks own words. They determine the only way to kill the buck is to shoot from the road and it was at that time they choose to break the rules and shoot from the road rather than let the buck go. I think you and Trouble Sh00ter ought to just come out and own the facts that you have major beef with any successful guide or outfitter, and are desperate to disparage them in any way. Facts and common sense seem irrelevant. We now have multiple threads about these recent cases that you two have started and nursed incessantly. Seems to me like little man jealousy syndrome. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coues247 Report post Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, trphyhntr said: Is debaca LDS? I dont think anyone on the commission is LDS, so why is that a factor? Jed Larsen might be baptized LDS but is far from a practicing member. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
trphyhntr Report post Posted 3 hours ago 10 minutes ago, Coues247 said: I dont think anyone on the commission is LDS, so why is that a factor? Jed Larsen might be baptized LDS but is far from a practicing member. The commission makes the charges? I thought they were like the judge. Sounds like he wasn’t charged with much Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EarlyBronco Report post Posted 2 hours ago 5 hours ago, 654321 said: No defense for A3. Plenty of A3 guides have been busted by AZGFD so your special treatment of A3 is garbage. Here's the bottom-line Adams and his client are on a "buck of a lifetime" Nicks own words. They determine the only way to kill the buck is to shoot from the road and it was at that time they choose to break the rules and shoot from the road rather than let the buck go. Pics of the buck? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NOTAGS Report post Posted 1 hour ago Careful...If you have or share pictures of an unlawfully taken buck, can you be charged? 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CatfishKev Report post Posted 51 minutes ago 3 hours ago, trphyhntr said: Is debaca LDS? Pretty sure he is not. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
654321 Report post Posted 44 minutes ago 3 hours ago, MogollonMan said: I think you and Trouble Sh00ter ought to just come out and own the facts that you have major beef with any successful guide or outfitter, and are desperate to disparage them in any way. Facts and common sense seem irrelevant. We now have multiple threads about these recent cases that you two have started and nursed incessantly. Seems to me like little man jealousy syndrome. I’ve got 2 good friends that guide so no problem with guides, just doesn’t break my heart when they get busted. My guess is the first time they got convicted is just the first time they got caught. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AZCoueser Report post Posted 22 minutes ago 1 hour ago, NOTAGS said: Careful...If you have or share pictures of an unlawfully taken buck, can you be charged? 5-yr revocation and GF will offer other members of the forum a plea deal to testify against you. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MogollonMan Report post Posted 9 minutes ago 22 minutes ago, 654321 said: I’ve got 2 good friends that guide so no problem with guides, just doesn’t break my heart when they get busted. My guess is the first time they got convicted is just the first time they got caught. The biggest difference between guys like you, Trouble Sh00ter, members of the commission, and a lot of these guides is the fine line of hypocrisy. I'd bet a month’s pay that every one of us who have hunter more than a few season have unintentionally and probably unknowingly (as I believe was the case with both guides discussed here) committed as egregious violations. Most of them would probably warrant a warning, small fine, or assigned education. But the commission, and you keyboard jurors, feeling max penalties and 5 year revocations are appropriate for these individuals is disgusting and abuse of power on the part of the commission. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coues247 Report post Posted 9 minutes ago 2 hours ago, trphyhntr said: The commission makes the charges? I thought they were like the judge. Sounds like he wasn’t charged with much Gotcha, I misunderstood what you were saying. You are correct but still find it hard to believe whichever officer was in charge wouldn't charge him because he is LDS. Much more likely he wasnt charged because he was one of the main men at A3. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites